Yu. S. Stepanov’s Method of Ascension
and Cognitive-Semiotic Dimensions
of Optimal Linguistic Creativity

Agres K., McGregor S., Purver M., Wiggins G. Conceptualizing creativity:
from distributional semantics to conceptual spaces. In: Proceedings of the 6 th
International Conference on Computational Creativity, 2015, p. 118–125.

Bergs A. Learn the rules like a pro, so you can break them like an artist (Picasso): Linguistic aberrancy from a constructional perspective. Zeitschrift für
Anglistik und Amerikanistik, 2018, No 66 (3), S. 277–293.

Boden M. The Creative Mind: Myths and Mechanisms. Routledge, 2003.
Brandt P. A. The Architecture of Semantic Domains. Spaces, Domains, and
Meaning. Essays in Cognitive Semiotics (European Semiotics 4). Bern, 2004.

Demyankov V. Z. Kognitivnyy dissonans: kognictsiya yazykovaja i vneyazykovaya [Cognitive dissonance: linguistic and non-linguistic cognition].
Kognitivnye issledovaniya yazyka [Cognitive Studies of Language], 2011, no. 9,
p. 33–40. (in Russ.)

Feshhenko V. V. O stile uchenogo: nauchnaya i khudozhestvennaya obraznost' v rabotah Yu. S. Stepanova [On the style of the scientist: scientific and
artistic figurativeness in Yu. S. Stepanov’s works]. In: Yazykovye parametry
sovremennoy tsivilizatsii [Linguistic parameters of modern civilization]. Moscow, 2013, p. 57–67. (in Russ.)

Finke R. A., Ward T. B., Smith S. M. Creative cognition: Theory, research,
and applications. Cambridge, MA, 1992.

Gabora L. Cognitive mechanisms underlying the creative process. In: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Creativity and Cognition.
Eds. T. Hewett and T. Kavanagh. UK, 2002, p. 126–133.

Giora R. On our mind: salience, context, and figurative language. Oxford,
2003.

Giora R., Givoni S., Fein O. Defaultness reigns: The case of sarcasm. Metaphor and Symbol, 2017a, no. 30 (4), p. 290–313.

Giora R., Givoni S., Heruti V., Fein O. The Role of Defaultness in Affecting
Pleasure: The Optimal Innovation Hypothesis Revisited. Metaphor and Symbol,
2017b, no. 32 (1), p. 1–18.

Hoffmann T. Construction grammar and creativity: Evolution, psychology,
and cognitive science. Cognitive Semiotics, 2020, no. 1. DOI 10.1515/cogsem2020-2018.

Hoffmann T. Creativity and construction grammar: cognitive and psychological issues. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik, 2018, No 66 (3), p. 259–
276.

Irishanova O. K. Igry fokusa v yazyke. Semantika, sintaksis i pragmatika
defokusirovaniya [Focus Games in Language. Semantics, Syntax and Pragmatics of Focusing]. Moscow, 2014. (in Russ.)

Irishanova O. K. O ponyatii kreativnosti i ego roli v metayazyke lingvisticheskikh opisaniy [On the notion of linguistic creativity and its role in linguistic description]. Kognitivnye issledovaniya yazyka [Cognitive Studies of
Language], 2009, no. 5, p. 157–171. (in Russ.)

Irishanova O. K., Kiose M. I. Tehnologii transfera mezhdistsiplinarnykh
terminov v lingvistiku [Technologies of transfer of interdisciplinary terms into
linguistics]. In: Lingvistika i semiotika kul'turnykh transferov: metody, printsipy, tekhnologii [Linguistics and semiotics of cultural transfers: methods, principles, technologies]. Moscow, 2016, p. 151–180. (in Russ.)

Iriskhanova O. K., Cienki A. The semiotics of gestures in cognitive linguistics: contribution and challenges. Issues of Cognitive Linguistics, 2018, no. 4,
p. 25–36.

Kaufman J. C., Plucker J. A. Intelligence and creativity. In: The Cambridge
Handbook of Intelligence. Eds. R. J. Sternberg, S. Kaufman. New York, 2011,
p. 771–783.

Kiose M. I. Naimenovanie v tekste: pryamoe i neprjamoe [Naming in text:
direct and indirect]. Moscow, 2015. (in Russ.)

Kiose M. I. The interplay of syntactic and lexical salience and its effect on
default figurative responses. Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric, 2020,
no. 61 (74), p. 161–178.

McGregor S., Agres K., Rataj K., Purver M., Wiggins G. Re-representing
metaphor: Modeling metaphor perception using dynamically contextual distributional semantics. Frontiers in Psychology, 2019, no. 10: 765. URL: https://
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov.

Schmid H.-J. (ed.) Entrenchment and the psychology of language learning.
How we reorganize and adapt linguistic knowledge. Washington DC, 2016.

Stepanov Yu. S. Ierarkhiya imen i rangi sub’ektov [Hierarchy of names and
subject ranks]. Izvestiya AN SSSR. Seria literatury i yazyka [Izvestiya of Academy of Sciences of USSR. Issues of literature and language studies], 1979,
iss. 38 (4), p. 333–348. (in Russ.)

Stepanov Yu. S. Imena, predikaty, predlozheniya. Semiologicheskaya grammatika [Names, predicates, sentences. Semiological grammar]. Moscow, 1981.
(in Russ.)

Stepanov Yu. S. Yazyk i metod. K sovremennoy filosofii yazyka [Language
and method. To the question of modern philosophy of language]. Moscow,
1998. (in Russ.)

Trope Y., Liberman N. Construal-Level theory of psychological distance.
Psychological Review, 2010, no. 117 (2), p. 440–463.

Turner M. Constructions and creativity. Cognitive Semiotics, 2020, no. 1.
DOI 10.1515/cogsem-2020-2019

Turner M. The origin of ideas: blending, creativity, and the human spark.
New York, 2014.

Turner M. The role of creativity in multimodal construction grammar.
Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik, 2018, No 66(3), S. 357–370.

Uhrig P. I don’t want to go all yoko ono on you – creativity and variation in
a family of constructions. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik, 2018,
No 66(3), S. 295–308.

Veale T. Exploding the creativity myth: the computational foundations of
linguistic creativity. London, 2012.

Veale Е., Amilcar Cardoso F. (eds.). Computational Creativity. The Philosophy and Engineering of Autonomously Creative Systems (Computational Synthesis and Creative Systems). Berlin, 2019.

Zykova I. V., Kiose M. I. Parametrizatsiya lingvisticheskoy kreativnosti
v mezhdiskursivnom aspekte: kinodiskurs vs diskurs detskoy literatury [Linguistic creativity parametrization in contrasting discourse types: cinematic discourse vs. discourse of children’s literature]. Issues of Cognitive Linguistics,
2020, no. 2, p. 26–40. (in Russ.)