The “Living Statues” at Times of Mausoleums and Unknown Soldiers:
New Commemorative Practices in the Mirror of Russian 20th Century Poetry

Авторы
K. V. Anisimov
The article traces the alterations of the “harmful statue” motif as it
was conceptualized by Roman Jakobson. In the present research the author
draws upon a number of representative verses by Russian 20 th century poets –
V. Bryusov, I. Selvinsky, B. Slutsky. The theoretical juxtaposition of the metaphoric nature of a monument and strategies of overcoming this nature has been
put in focus of this work. These strategies are represented in the convergence of
sculpture and body (the reinforcement of iconicity), in implicating the metonymic, substitutional character in new monuments. The author shows how the
practice of establishing the new “political” tombs (unknown soldiers, mausoleums) proliferating since 1920s was reflected in verses’ rhetoric and affected
these texts’ genre poetics. As a first collection of examples the “Pompeian”
plots of Russian “ekphrastic” poetry are studied. Here Russian poets rethink the technology invented by mid-nineteenth century Italian archaeologists who were
the first to introduce the sculptural reconstruction of human bodies preserved
by volcanic soil in area of 79 a.d. Vesuvius eruption. The first step on this way
of rethinking the “living statue” motif was the intrinsic to modernism and openly exposed problematizing of the relationships between body and its representations in stone or metal. Having begun its “own” life, the sculpture is currently
observed as a direct, “drawn on a contour” replica of an organism, unprecedented in unicity of its physical existence. This semiotic discovery has formed the
receptive “niches” of expectations – prior to the emergence of the next commemorative practice, the creation in 1924 Vladimir Lenin’s “living sculpture”
(A. Yurchak) or “self-icon” (J. B. Platt). However one difference here was
of specific significance: the “Pompeian” plaster reconstructions were anonymous whereas the Bolshevik leader’s name was in contrast not just commonly
known but also as strongly mythologized as his remains kept in mausoleum
were. The semiosis taking place within a triangle body – monument – name had
formed a perspective for the forthcoming of a new social commemorative practice, memory place and poetic image – the tomb of an Unknown Soldier. The
author illustrates the interaction of the two political and memory cults on the
level of official rhetoric and in the sphere of literary motifs.
DOI
10.25205/2307-1737-2020-1-186-206
Аннотация

The article traces the alterations of the “harmful statue” motif as it
was conceptualized by Roman Jakobson. In the present research the author
draws upon a number of representative verses by Russian 20 th century poets –
V. Bryusov, I. Selvinsky, B. Slutsky. The theoretical juxtaposition of the metaphoric nature of a monument and strategies of overcoming this nature has been
put in focus of this work. These strategies are represented in the convergence of
sculpture and body (the reinforcement of iconicity), in implicating the metonymic, substitutional character in new monuments. The author shows how the
practice of establishing the new “political” tombs (unknown soldiers, mausoleums) proliferating since 1920s was reflected in verses’ rhetoric and affected
these texts’ genre poetics. As a first collection of examples the “Pompeian”
plots of Russian “ekphrastic” poetry are studied. Here Russian poets rethink the technology invented by mid-nineteenth century Italian archaeologists who were
the first to introduce the sculptural reconstruction of human bodies preserved
by volcanic soil in area of 79 a.d. Vesuvius eruption. The first step on this way
of rethinking the “living statue” motif was the intrinsic to modernism and openly exposed problematizing of the relationships between body and its representations in stone or metal. Having begun its “own” life, the sculpture is currently
observed as a direct, “drawn on a contour” replica of an organism, unprecedented in unicity of its physical existence. This semiotic discovery has formed the
receptive “niches” of expectations – prior to the emergence of the next commemorative practice, the creation in 1924 Vladimir Lenin’s “living sculpture”
(A. Yurchak) or “self-icon” (J. B. Platt). However one difference here was
of specific significance: the “Pompeian” plaster reconstructions were anonymous whereas the Bolshevik leader’s name was in contrast not just commonly
known but also as strongly mythologized as his remains kept in mausoleum
were. The semiosis taking place within a triangle body – monument – name had
formed a perspective for the forthcoming of a new social commemorative practice, memory place and poetic image – the tomb of an Unknown Soldier. The
author illustrates the interaction of the two political and memory cults on the
level of official rhetoric and in the sphere of literary motifs.

Keywords
Tomb of the Unknown Soldier, Lenin’s Mausoleum, the places of memory, poetic ballads, sculptural ekphrasis, Valery Bryusov, Ilya Selvinsky, Boris Slutsky

Adonieva S. B. Ritual'nye ploshhadki. [Ritual Playgrounds]. URL: http://
folk.ru/Research/adonyeva_ritual_plostch.php/. (in Russ.)

Alekseev M. P. Pushkin i mirovaya literatura [Pushkin and World Literature]. Leningrad, 1987. (in Russ.)

Anderson B. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread
of Nationalism. Moscow, 2001. (in Russ.)

Antokolsky P. Collection of Works. In 4 vols. Moscow, 1971, vol. 1.
(in Russ.)

Bryusov V. Ya. Collection of Works. In 7 vols. Moscow, 1973, vol. 1; 1974,
vol. 3. (in Russ.)

Gasparov M. L. O. Mandelshtam: Grazhdanskaya lirika 1937 goda [Mandelshtam: The Civic Lyrics of 1937]. Moscow, 1996. (in Russ.)

Goltsev V. Neugasimyj ogon' vechnoj slavy [Inextinguishable Fire of Eternal Glory]. Izvestiya, 1967, no. 108, May 8, p. 1–2. (in Russ.)

Inglis K. S. Entombing Unknown Soldiers: From London to Paris and Baghdad. History and Memory, 1993, vol. 5, no. 2, p. 7–31.

Kantorowicz E. The King's Two Bodies. A Study in Mediaeval Political
Theology. Moscow, 2015. (in Russ.)

Khodasevich V. Collection of Works. In 4 vols. Moscow, 1996, vol. 1.
(in Russ.)

Levi P. Pompejskaya devochka [A Pompeian Girl]. Inostrannaya literatura,
2015, no. 5, p. 44. (in Russ.)

Lloyd D. W. Battlefield Tourism. Pilgrimage and the Commemoration of the
Great War in Britain, Australia and Canada, 1919–1939. Oxford; New York,
1998.

Malysheva S. Yu. “Na miru krasna”: instrumentalizacija smerti v Sovetskoj
Rossii [“Beautiful in Public’s Eyes”: The Death’s Instrumentalization in Soviet
Russia]. Moscow, 2019. (in Russ.)

Marshak S. Collection of Works. In 8 vols. Moscow, 1970, vol. 5. (in Russ.)

Martynov L. Collection of Works. In 3 vols. Moscow, 1977, vol. 3.
(in Russ.)

Mej L. Selected Works. Intr., prep. and comment. by K. K. Buhmejer. Leningrad, 1972. (in Russ.)

Merridale K. War, Death and Remembrance in Soviet Russia. In: War and
Remembrance in the Twentieth Century. Eds. J. Winter and E. Sivan, Cambridge, 1999, p. 61–83.

Moorman E. M. Pompeii’s Ashes. The Reception of the Cities Buried by
Vesuvius in Literature, Music and Drama. Boston; Berlin; Munich, 2015.

Orlov S. Collection of Works. In 3 vols. Moscow, 1979, vol. 1. (in Russ.)

Platt J. B. Snow White and the Enchanted Palace: A Reading of Lenin’s Architectural Cult. Representations, 2015, vol. 129, no. 1, p. 86–115.

Plinij Starshij (Pliny the Elder). Estestvoznanie. Ob iskusstve [Natural History. On the Arts]. Transl., intr. and comment. by G. A. Taronyan. Moscow, 1994.
(in Russ.)

Presto J. Uncanny Excavations: Khodasevich, Pompeii and Remains of the
Past. The Russian Review, 2015, vol. 74 (April), p. 272–292.

Schönle A. Architecture of Oblivion: Ruins and Historical Consciousness in
Modern Russia. Moscow, 2018. (in Russ.)

Selvinsky I. Collection of Works. In 6 vols. Moscow, 1971, vol. 1. (in Russ.)

Shteinberg A. Mogila neizvestnogo soldata [The Tomb of the Unknown
Soldier]. URL: https://www.stihi.ru/2013/09/23/2163/. (in Russ.)

Slutsky B. Collection of Works. In 3 vols. Moscow, 1991, vol. 1. (in Russ.)

Strashnov S. “Molodeet i lad ballad”. Ballada v istorii russkoj sovetskoj
pojezii [“And the Ballad Harmony is Getting Younger”. Ballad in the History of
Soviet Russian Poetry]. Moscow, 1991. (in Russ.)

Tyupa V. I. Postsimvolizm: teoreticheskie ocherki russkoj pojezii XX veka
[Postsymbolism: Essays in the Theory of Russian 20th Century Poetry] Samara,
1998. (in Russ.)

Tolstoy L. N. Complete Collection of Works. In 90 vols. Moscow, 1937,
vol. 56. (in Russ.)

Tumarkin N. Lenin Lives!: The Lenin Cult in Soviet Russia. St. Petersburg,
1997. (in Russ.)

Vaiskopf M. Krasnyj chudotvorets: Lenin v evrejskoj i khristianskoj traditsiyakh [The Red Miracle Man: Lenin in Jewish and Christian Traditions]. In:
Kontsept chuda v slavyanskoj i evrejskoj kul'turnoj traditsii. Moscow, 2001,
p. 336–366. (in Russ.)

Yampolsky M. In the Shadow of Monuments. Notes on Iconoclasm and
Time. In: Soviet Hieroglyphics. Visual Culture in Late Twentieth-Century Russia. Ed. by N. Condee. Indianapolis, 1995, p. 93–112.

Yurchak A. Bodies of Lenin: the Hidden Science of Communist Sovereignty. Representations, 2015, vol. 129, no. 1, p. 116–157.

Yurchak A. Netlennost' formy: Leninizm i material'nost' mav-zolejnogo tela
[Imperishability of Form: Leninism and Materiality of the Mausoleum Body].
Neprikosnovennyj zapas, 2013, no. 3. URL: https://magazines.gorky.media/nz/
2013/3/netlennost-formy.html#_ftn1/. (in Russ.)

Zholkovsky A., Shcheglov Yu. Ex Ungue Leonem. Detskie rasskazy L. Tolstogo i pojetika vyrazitel'nosti [Ex Ungue Leonem. L. Tolstoy’s Sketches for
Children and the Poetics of Expressiveness]. Moscow, 2016. (in Russ.)

The “Living Statues” at Times of Mausoleums and Unknown Soldiers:
New Commemorative Practices in the Mirror of Russian 20th Century Poetry С. 186–0. DOI 10.25205/2307-1737-2020-1-186-206