of a sentence. Meanwhile, if an event began long ago and is taking place at the time
of reference (for instance, at the moment of speech), such context does not require
davno to function as the focus. At present, the hypothesis was verified on the spoken
corpora material. The key to the analysis is the prosody of the focus. On the whole,
the hypothesis appeared to be true. At the same time, it acquired some substantial
corrections. If earlier it was presumed that the context of pluperfect arises from the
combination of davno and the aspectual forms of a verb, at present, the corpus analysis has revealed the third factor: it is the lexical semantics of the verb. The corpus
analysis shows that the verbs of information transfer and the verbs in the negative
can recover the connection of the past events with the point of reference. This meaning, in its turn, can cause the loss of the invariable focal function of davno in the context of the general factual in the past.
The paper is aimed at the analysis of expressing the meaning ‘long ago’ or the meaning of pluperfect. In the meaning of ‘long ago’ the Russian word davno is the focus
of a sentence. Meanwhile, if an event began long ago and is taking place at the time
of reference (for instance, at the moment of speech), such context does not require
davno to function as the focus. At present, the hypothesis was verified on the spoken
corpora material. The key to the analysis is the prosody of the focus. On the whole,
the hypothesis appeared to be true. At the same time, it acquired some substantial
corrections. If earlier it was presumed that the context of pluperfect arises from the
combination of davno and the aspectual forms of a verb, at present, the corpus analysis has revealed the third factor: it is the lexical semantics of the verb. The corpus
analysis shows that the verbs of information transfer and the verbs in the negative
can recover the connection of the past events with the point of reference. This meaning, in its turn, can cause the loss of the invariable focal function of davno in the context of the general factual in the past.
Список литературы
Apresyan Yu. D. Glagoly momental'nogo dejstviya i performativy v russkom yazyke [Verbs of momentary action in the Russian language]. In: Rusistika segodnya. Yazyk: sistema i ee funkcionirovanie [Russian languages studies today. Language: system and its functioning]. Moscow, Nauka, 1988,
p. 57–78. (in Russ.)
Boguslavsky I. M. Sfera deystviya leksicheskikh edinits [Sphere of action of
lexical units]. Moscow, Yazyki russkoy kul'tury, 1996. (in Russ.)
Bryzgunova T. V. Intonatsiya [Intonation]. In: Russkaya grammatika [Russian grammar]. Moscow, Nauka, 1982, vol. 1, p. 96–122. (in Russ.)
Bulygina T. V., Shmelev A. D. Neskol'ko zamechaniy o slovakh tipa neskol'ko [Some comments on the words like neskol'ko]. In: Yazyk: sistema
i funktsionirovanie [Language: system and function]. Moscow, Yazyki russkoy
kul'tury, 1988, p. 44–54. (in Russ.)
Bulygina T. V., Shmelev A. D. Yazykovaja kontseptualizatsiya mira (na materiale russkoy grammatiki) [Linguistic conceptualization of the world (based on
Russian grammar)]. Moscow, Yazyki slav'anskoy kul'tury, 1997. (in Russ.)
Glovinskaja M. Ya. Semanticheskie tipy vidovogo protivopostavleniya
russkogo glagola [Semantic types of oppositions in the Russian verbs]. Moscow,
Nauka, 1982. (in Russ.)
Kovtunova I. I. Sovremennyy russkiy yazyk. Poryadok slov i aktual'noe
chlenenie predlozheniya [Modern Russian language. Word order and actual division of the sentence]. Moscow, Prosveshhenie, 1976. (in Russ.)
Paducheva E. V. K intonatsionnoy transkriptsii dlya predlozheniy proizvol'noy sintaksicheskoy slozhnosti [On the intonation transcription for the sentences with arbitrary syntactic complexity]. In: Voprosy kibernetiki.
Semioticheskie issledovaniya [Issues of Cybernetics. Semiotic Studies]. Moscow, Nauchnyj sovet po kompleksnoj probleme “Kibernetika”, 1989, p. 18–29.
(in Russ.)
Paducheva E. V. O semantike sintaksisa. [On the semantics of syntax]. Moscow, Nauka, 1974. (in Russ.)
Paducheva E. V. Davno i dolgo. In: Logicheskiy analiz yazyka: Yazyk i vremya. Moscow, Indrik, 1997. (in Russ.)
Sichinava D. V. Tipologiya plyuskvamperfekta. Slavyanskiy plyuskvamperfekt [The typology of pluperfect. Slavic pluperfect] Moscow, AST-Press
Kniga, 2013. (in Russ.)
Shoshitayshvili I. A. Funktsii i status plyuskvamperfekta v glagol'noy sisteme [Functions and status of pluperfect in the verb system]. Doctoral thesis.
Moscow, RGGU, 1998. (in Russ.)
Yanko T. E. Ispol'zovanie korpusnogo materiala pri analize kommunikativnykh funktsiy leksem redko i malo [The use of corpus in the analysis of
communicative functions of lexemes redko and malo]. Voprosy filologii [Issues
in Philology], 2014, no. 3–4 (48), p. 60–68 (in Russ.)
Yаnko T. E. Kommunikаtivnye strаtegii russkoy rechi [The communicаtive
strаtegies of the Russiаn speech]. Moscow, Yаzyki slаvyаnskoi kul’tury Publ.,
2001. (in Russ.)
Comrie B. Aspect: an introduction to the study of verbal aspect and related
problems. Cambridge, CUP, 1976.
Comrie B. Tense. Cambridge, CUP, 1985.
Reichenbach H. Elements of Symbolic Logic, New York, McMillan, 1947.
The Meaning of Pluperfect:
Lexical and Grammatical Semantics С. 145–158. DOI 10.25205/2307-1737-2021-1-145-158