and linguistic stereotyping in relation to advertising discourse. Advertising discourse borrows language techniques and units from other discourses that allow
defining the “secondary” nature of its semiosis and language. Taking it into account, the study compares advertising with the avant-garde artistic discourse which is genetically and typologically one of the main discourses-“donors” of
advertising which can be described as discourse-“logophagus”. In the comparison of discourses, the paper reveals two types of linguistic creativity: linguistic
and discourse creativity. Linguistic creativity is the creation of new linguistic
units with the aim of forming a new language or updating existing one. Dis-
course creativity is updating at the “microstructure level” of discourse aimed at
the most successful achievement of discourse goals and increasing the effectiveness of communication. Discourse creativity is basic to advertising discourse. The study proposes a two-stage model of language manipulation. The
aim of the first stage is “deautomatization” of the recipient’s perception that
meets the criteria of linguistic creativity, while the aim of the second one is recipient’s “automazation” that corresponds to stereotyping. The paper explores
the features of linguistic creativity and stereotyping in poetry and advertising on
the basis of three text types: the avant-garde poetic text (“In the Car” (1913) by
Mayakovsky), the hybrid avant-garde and advertising texts (“The White Red
Wedge of White” (1920) by Lisitzky and “Soviet Alphabet” (1919) by Mayakovsky and Jakobson) and the contemporary advertising text. As a result, the
study models a scale of linguistic creativity in advertising discourse. Linguistic
creativity is a gradual phenomenon, the degree of which can increase or decrease depending on the existence, frequency and degree of manifestation of
a particular parameter in the discourse. The main features of linguistic creativity
are structural (the existence or not of linguistic anomalies), semantic (the existence or not of polysemy; explicit / implicit expression of information) and
pragmatic (“strong” / “weak” communication) criteria.
The paper deals with the boundaries between linguistic creativity
and linguistic stereotyping in relation to advertising discourse. Advertising discourse borrows language techniques and units from other discourses that allow
defining the “secondary” nature of its semiosis and language. Taking it into account, the study compares advertising with the avant-garde artistic discourse which is genetically and typologically one of the main discourses-“donors” of
advertising which can be described as discourse-“logophagus”. In the comparison of discourses, the paper reveals two types of linguistic creativity: linguistic
and discourse creativity. Linguistic creativity is the creation of new linguistic
units with the aim of forming a new language or updating existing one. Dis-
course creativity is updating at the “microstructure level” of discourse aimed at
the most successful achievement of discourse goals and increasing the effectiveness of communication. Discourse creativity is basic to advertising discourse. The study proposes a two-stage model of language manipulation. The
aim of the first stage is “deautomatization” of the recipient’s perception that
meets the criteria of linguistic creativity, while the aim of the second one is recipient’s “automazation” that corresponds to stereotyping. The paper explores
the features of linguistic creativity and stereotyping in poetry and advertising on
the basis of three text types: the avant-garde poetic text (“In the Car” (1913) by
Mayakovsky), the hybrid avant-garde and advertising texts (“The White Red
Wedge of White” (1920) by Lisitzky and “Soviet Alphabet” (1919) by Mayakovsky and Jakobson) and the contemporary advertising text. As a result, the
study models a scale of linguistic creativity in advertising discourse. Linguistic
creativity is a gradual phenomenon, the degree of which can increase or decrease depending on the existence, frequency and degree of manifestation of
a particular parameter in the discourse. The main features of linguistic creativity
are structural (the existence or not of linguistic anomalies), semantic (the existence or not of polysemy; explicit / implicit expression of information) and
pragmatic (“strong” / “weak” communication) criteria.
Список литературы
Amiri L. P., Iliyasova S. V. Yazykovaya igra v reklame [Language game in
advertising]. In: Reklamnyy diskurs i reklamnyy tekst. Moscow, 2011, p. 225–
245. (in Russ.)
Apresyan Yu. D. Yazykovye anomalii: tipy i funktsii [Language anomalies:
types and functions]. In: Res Philologica: Filologicheskie issledovaniya. Moscow, Leningrad, 1990, p. 50–71. (in Russ.)
Baldini M. Il linguaggio della pubblicità. Roma, Le fantaparole, 2003.
Bart R. Ritorika obraza [The rhetoric of the image]. In: Bart R. Izbrannye
raboty: Semiotika. Poetika. Moscow, 1994, p. 297–318. (in Russ.)
Berman M. The Copywriter’s Toolkit: The Complete Guide to Strategic Advertising Copy. Oxford University, 2012.
Blakemore D. Understanding Utterances. Oxford University, 1992.
Bragina N. G. Sotsiokul'turnye konstrukty v yazyke [The rhetoric of the image]. Moscow, 2013. (in Russ.)
Brik O. M. Iskusstvo ob"yavlyat' (Neskol'ko obshchikh zamechaniy) [The
Art of Declaring (Some General Comments)]. Zhurnalist, 1923, no. 5, p. 26–28.
(in Russ.)
Cook G. The Discourse off Advertising. London, New York, 2006.
Demiyankov V. Z. Stereotip [Stereotype]. In: Kratkiy slovar' kognitivnykh
terminov. Moscow, 1996, p. 177–179. (in Russ.)
Demiyankov V. Z. Yazykovoe tvorchestvo i rechevaya kreativnost' [Linguistic creativity and verbal creativity]. In: Yazyk kak mediator mezhdu znaniem i iskusstvom: Sbornik dokladov Mezhdunarodnogo nauchnogo seminara.
Moscow, 2009, p. 11–19. (in Russ.)
Eko U. Otsutstvuyushchaya struktura. Vvedenie v semiologiyu [Absent
structure. Introduction to semiology]. Moscow, 2004. (in Russ.)
Fairclough N. Language and Power. London, Longman, 1989.
Fateeva N. A. Poeziya kak filologicheskiy diskurs [Poetry as a philological
discourse]. Moscow, 2017. (in Russ.)
Feshchenko V. V. Semiotika tvorchestva i lingvistika kreativnosti [Semiotics
of creativity and linguistics of creativity]. Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremen-
nost', 2008, no. 6, p. 143–150. (in Russ.)
Feshchenko V. V. Yazyk kak tvorchestvo i tvorchestvo v yazyke: k istorii
lingvisticheskoy idei [Language as creativity and creativity in language: to the
history of a linguistic idea]. Critique and Semiotics, 2012, no. 17, p. 84–94.
(in Russ.)
Galliot M. Essai sur la Langue de la Réclame Contemporaine. Toulouse,
Privat, 1955.
Gridina T. A. Yazykovaya igra: stereotip i tvorchestvo [Language game: ste-
reotype and creativity]. Ekateriburg, 1996. (in Russ.)
Grigoriev V. P. Velimir Khlebnikov v chetyrekhmernom prostranstve
yazyka. Izbrannye raboty. 1958–2000-e gody [Velimir Khlebnikov in the four-
dimensional space of the language. Selected works.]. Moscow, 2006. (in Russ.)
Gumboldt V. fon. Priroda i svoystva yazyka voobshche [The nature and
properties of the language in general]. In: Gumboldt V. fon. Izbrannye trudy po
yazykoznaniyu. Moscow, 1984, p. 74–83. (in Russ.)
Iriskhanova O. K. Igry fokusa v yazyke: semantika, sintaksis i pragmatika
defokusirovaniya [Games of focus in language: semantics, syntax and pragmatics of defocusing]. Moscow, 2014. (in Russ.)
Iriskhanova O. K. Lingvokreativnye osnovaniya teorii nominalizatsii. [Linguistic and creative foundations of the theory of nominalization]. Doct. of
Philol. Diss. Moscow, 2004. (in Russ.)
Issers O. S. Rechevoe vozdeystvie. [Speech exposure] Moscow, 2009.
(in Russ.)
Khomskiy N. Yazyk i myshlenie [Language and thinking]. Moscow, 1972.
(in Russ.)
Kiose M. I. Lingvokognitivnye tekhniki parametricheskogo rezonansa
[Linguocognitive techniques of parametric resonance]. In: Kognitivnye isledovaniya yazyka. Moscow, 2018, iss. 35, p. 219–232. (in Russ.)
Kiose M. I. Tekhniki i parametry nepryamogo naimenovaniya v tekste
[Techniques and parameters of indirect names in the text]. Doct. of Philol. Diss.
Moscow, 2015. (in Russ.)
Krasnykh V. V. Etnopsikholingvistika i lingvokul'turologiya [Ethnopsycholinguistics and linguoculturology]. Moscow, 2002. (in Russ.)
Langlotz A. Idiomatic Creativity: A cognitive-linguistic model of idiom-representation and idiom-variation in English. Basel, John Benjamins B. V.,
2006.
Langlotz A. Language, creativity, and cognition from. In: The Routledge
Handbook of Language and Creativity. Routledge, 2015, p. 40–60.
Leech G. N. English in Advertising. London, 1966.
Lippman U. Obshchestvennoe mnenie [Public opinion]. Moscow, 2004. (in
Russ.)
Pirogova Yu. K., Parshin P. B. Reklamnyy tekst: semiotika i lingvistika
[Advertising text: semiotics and linguistics]. Moscow, 2000. (in Russ.)
Quasthoff U. M. The uses of stereotype in everyday argument. Journal of
Pragmatics, 1978, vol. 2, p. 1–48.
Radbil T. B. Yazykovye anomalii v khudozhestvennom tekste: Andrey Platonov i drugie [Language anomalies in a literary text: Andrei Platonov and others]. Moscow, 2012. (in Russ.)
Remchukova E. N. Pragmaticheskaya i esteticheskaya tsennost' “massovogo
kreativa” [The pragmatic and aesthetic value of “mass creativity”]. In: Trudy
Instituta russkogo yazyka im. V. V. Vinogradova. Moscow, 2016, iss. 7, p. 157–
167. (in Russ.)
Serebrennikov B. A. The role of the human factor in language. Language
and thinking. Moscow, 1988. (in Russ.)
Shatin Yu. V. Postroenie reklamnogo teksta [Creating an advertising text].
Moscow, 2003. (in Russ.)
Shatin Yu. V., Voskolovich M. A. Vliyanie 25-go kadra v reklame na
podsoznanie zritelya [Influence of the 25 th frame in advertising on the subconscious mind of the audience]. In: Materialy konferentsiy GNII “Natsrazvitie”.
Sbornik izbrannykh statey. Ser. “Aprel’ 2016”. St. Petersburg, 2016, p. 137–
141. (in Russ.)
Silantev I. V., Shatin Yu. V. Diskurs i stereotip [Discourse and stereotype].
Critique and Semiotics, 2014, no. 20, p. 10–17. (in Russ.)
Simone R. Pubblicità e creatività linguistica. In: Baldini M. Il linguaggio
della pubblicità. Roma, Le fantaparole, 2003, p. 115–119.
Sokolova O. V. Diskursy aktivnogo vozdeystviya: teoriya i tipologiya. [Discourses of active influence: theory and typology.] Abstract Doct. of Philol Diss.
Moscow, 2015. (in Russ.)
Sokolova O.V. Gibridnye teksty kak forma vzaimodeystviya avangardnogo
khudozhestvennogo i politicheskogo diskursov [Hybrid texts as a form of interaction between avant-garde art and political discourses]. Slovo.ru: baltiyskiy
aktsent. 2020. T. 11. No 1. Pp. 50–86. (in Russ.)
Sperber D., Wilson D. Relevance: Communication and Cognition, Oxford
University, 1995.
Stepanov Yu. S. Asimptota – eto stil' tvorchestva [Asymptota is a style of
creativity]. In: Tvorchestvo vne traditsionnykh klassifikatsiy gumanitarnykh
nauk. Moscow, Kaluga, 2008. (in Russ.)
Stepanov Yu. S. V mire semiotiki [In the world of semiotics]. In: Semiotika:
Antologiya. Moscow, 2001. (in Russ.)
Vinokur G. O. Mayakovskiy – novator yazyka [Mayakovsky – language innovator]. Moscow, 2006. (in Russ.)
Vysotskaya I. V. Pretsedentnost' kak sredstvo obespecheniya polnotsennosti
obshcheniya v sfere reklamy [Precedence as a means of ensuring full-fledged
communication in the field of advertising]. Critique and Semiotics, 2014, no. 1,
p. 125–137. (in Russ.)
Zabotkina V. I. Kognitivnye osnovy lingvisticheskoy kreativnosti [Cognitive
foundations of linguistic creativity]. Kognitivnye issledovaniya yazyka, 2019,
iss. 38, p. 208–216. (in Russ.)
Zykova I. V. Metayazyk lingvokul'turologii: konstanty i varianty [The metalanguage of linguoculturology: constants and variations]. Moscow, 2017.
(in Russ.)
Zykova I. V. Kontseptosfera kul'tury i frazeologiya: Teoriya i metody lingvokul'turologicheskogo izucheniya [The conceptual sphere of culture and phraseology: Theory and methods of linguocultural studies]. Moscow, 2015.
(in Russ.)
Discourse-“Logophagus”: The Boundaries of Linguistic Creativity and
Stereotypy in Advertising С. 114–142. DOI 10.25205/2307-1737-2020-1-114-142