generation (N. Uspensky, A. Levitov, F. Reshetnikov, N. Pomyalovsky etc.)
in the Russian Literature of the 1860s. These writers brought “the bad writing”
as “a new word” in the Russian Literature. The subject of research is model
of literary and domestic behavior of this generation of “folk-writers” and its
difference from the model of behavior of writers-raznochintsy of previous generation based on sample of a “new man”. Features of socio-cultural and domes-
tic behavior are as follows: 1) in spite of certain centers of attention to themselves (“Contemporary”, “Russian word”), these writers have not become part
of the journal-editorial communities and, as a rule, did not develop general ideas; 2) the declaration of independence was “supported” by alienation from the
way of life adopted in the circle of the magazine raznochintsy intelligentsia;
their way of life was ostentatiously marginal; 3) the new generation is characterized by “Bohemian”, wandering life, begging, alcohol abuse and other manifestations of “asociality”. In the end we draw a conclusion that the literary reputa-
tion of carriers of new word about common people by a man of the common
people created at the initial stage by criticism, and then supported by self-description called to literary life the phenomenon of “folk-writer”; the literary
niche was created deliberately according to the theory of social realism as a new
direction in the post Gogol’s period of literature development.
The article considers emergence of writers-raznochintsy of young
generation (N. Uspensky, A. Levitov, F. Reshetnikov, N. Pomyalovsky etc.)
in the Russian Literature of the 1860s. These writers brought “the bad writing”
as “a new word” in the Russian Literature. The subject of research is model
of literary and domestic behavior of this generation of “folk-writers” and its
difference from the model of behavior of writers-raznochintsy of previous generation based on sample of a “new man”. Features of socio-cultural and domes-
tic behavior are as follows: 1) in spite of certain centers of attention to themselves (“Contemporary”, “Russian word”), these writers have not become part
of the journal-editorial communities and, as a rule, did not develop general ideas; 2) the declaration of independence was “supported” by alienation from the
way of life adopted in the circle of the magazine raznochintsy intelligentsia;
their way of life was ostentatiously marginal; 3) the new generation is characterized by “Bohemian”, wandering life, begging, alcohol abuse and other manifestations of “asociality”. In the end we draw a conclusion that the literary reputa-
tion of carriers of new word about common people by a man of the common
people created at the initial stage by criticism, and then supported by self-description called to literary life the phenomenon of “folk-writer”; the literary
niche was created deliberately according to the theory of social realism as a new
direction in the post Gogol’s period of literature development.
Список литературы
Aykhenvald Yu. I. Siluety russkikh pisateley [Silhouettes of Russian Writers]. In 3 vols. Moscow, 1906–1910, vol. 2. (in Russ.)
G-n Uspenskiy [Mr. Uspensky]. Sankt-Peterburgskie
vedomosti, 1863, no. 11, January 13. (in Russ.)
Blagoveshchenskiy N. A. N. G. Pomyalovskiy. Biograficheskiy ocherk [Pomyalovsky. Biographical essay]. Sovremennik [Contemporary], 1864, no. 3.
(in Russ.)
Boborykin P. D. Vospominaniya [Memories]. In 2 vols. Moscow, 1965,
vol. 1. (in Russ.)
Brandes G. Russkie vpechatleniya [Russian impressions]. Moscow, 2002.
(in Russ.)
Dyachuk T. V. Pisateli-raznochintsy 1860-kh godov: Fomy literaturnogo
tvorchestva i sotsial'nogo povedeniya [Writers-raznochintsy of the 1860s: Forms
of literary creativity and social behavior]. St. Petersburg, 2011. (in Russ.)
Edelson E. N. Sovremennaya natural'naya shkola [Modern natural school].
Biblioteka dlya chteniya [Library for reading], 1864, no. 3. (in Russ.)
Eykhenbaum B. M. Moy vremennik. Marshrut v bessmertie [My annals.
Destination to immortality]. Moscow, 2001. (in Russ.)
Goncharova O. M. Novye lyudi 1860-kh: idei – teksty – sotsiopraktiki.
Lektsii po istorii russkoy kul'tury [The new people of the 1860s: ideas – texts –
sociopractics. Lectures on the history of Russian culture]. St. Petersburg, 2011.
(in Russ.)
Kotlyarevskiy N. A. Kanun osvobozhdeniya. 1855–1861. Iz zhizni idey
i nastroeniy v radikal'nykh krugakh togo vremeni [The eve of the liberation.
1855–1861. From the life of ideas and sentiments in radical circles of the time].
Petrograd, 1916. (in Russ.)
Kozmin B. P. Blagosvetlov i “Russkoe slovo” [Blagosvetlov and “Russian
word”]. Sovremennik [Contemporary], 1922, pt. 1. (in Russ.)
Manchester L. Popovichi v miru: dukhovenstvo, intelligentsiya i stanovlenie
sovremennogo samosoznaniya v Rossii [Holy fathers, secular sons. Clergy, intelligentsia, and the modern self in revolutionary Russia]. Moscow, 2015, 448 p.
(in Russ.)
Mikhaylovskiy N. K. G. I. Uspenskiy kak pisatel' i chelovek [G. I. Uspensky
as a writer and a person]. In: Mikhaylovskiy N. Literaturnaya kritika: Stat'i
o russkoy literature XIX – nachala XX veka [Literary criticism: Articles about
Russian Literature of the XIX – early XX century]. Leningrad, 1989, p. 283–
297. (in Russ.)
Paperno I. Semiotika povedeniya: Nikolay Chernyshevskiy – chelovek epokhi realizma [Semiotics of behavior: Nikolai Chernyshevsky is a man of the
period of realism]. Moscow, 1996. (in Russ.)
Pecherskaya T. I. Raznochintsy shestidesyatykh godov XIX veka: fenomen
samosoznaniya v aspekte filologicheskoy germenevtiki: (Memuary, dnevniki,
pis'ma, belletristika) [Raznochintsy sixties of the 19 th century: the phenomenon
of self-consciousness in the aspect of philological hermeneutics: (Memoirs, diaries, letters, fiction)]. Novosibirsk, 1999. (in Russ.)
Shelgunov N. Narodnyy realizm v literature [Popular realism in literature].
Delo [Deed], 1871, no. 5, p. 2. (in Russ.)
Skabichevskiy A. M. Istoriya noveyshey russkoy literatury. 1848–1908 gody
[History of modern Russian Literature. 1848–1908 years]. St. Petersburg, 1909.
(in Russ.)
Smirnov I. Psikhodiakhronologika: Psikhoistoriya russkoy literatury ot romantizma do nashikh dney [Psychohistory of Russian Literature from romanticism to the present day]. Moscow, 1994. (in Russ.)
Sozina E. K. O “plokhopisi” v literature [About “bad writing” in literature].
In: Fenomen tvorcheskoy neudachi [The phenomenon of creative failure].
Ekaterinburg, 2011, p. 324–345. (in Russ.)
Turgenev I. S. [Complete works: in 30 vols.; letters: in 13 vols.]. Moscow;
Leningrad, 1964, vol. 7: Letters. 1867–1869. 614 p. (in Russ.)
Tynyanov Yu. N. Literaturnyy fakt [Literary fact]. In: Tynyanov Yu. N.
Poetika. Istoriya literatury. Kino [Poetics. History of literature. Cinema]. Moscow, 1977. (in Russ.)
Uspenskiy N. V. Iz proshlogo [From the past]. Moscow, 1889.
Vengerov S. A. Russkiy biograficheskiy slovar' [Russian biographical dictionary]. URL: http://rulex.ru/01030215.htm/. (in Russ.) (accessed 10.06.2019).
Vorobieva O. A. Zhurnal “Russkoe slovo”: istoriya formirovaniya kruga
sotrudnikov i literaturnaya pozitsiya (1859–1862) [Journal “Russian word”: The
history of the formation of the circle of employees and literary position (1859–
1862)]. Cand. of Philol. Diss. Moscow, 2019. (in Russ.)
Wirtschafter Elise K. Sotsial'nye struktury: raznochintsy v Rossiyskoy imperii [Structures of Society]. Moscow, 2002, 271 p. (in Russ.)
Yatsimirskiy A. I. Vospominaniya pisateley-samorodkov ob ikh starshikh
sobrat'yakh [Memoirs of writers-nuggets about their older brethren]. Russkaya
mysl' [Russian thought], 1902, no. 11. (in Russ.)
Zamotin I. I. Sorokovye i shestidesyatye gody. Ocherki po istorii russkoy
literatury XIX stoletiya [The fortieth and sixtieth years. Essays on the history of
Russian Literature of the 19 th century]. Moscow, Petrograd, 1915. (in Russ.)
Zasodimskiy P. Iv. Levitov. Iz vospominaniy [Iv. Levitov. From the memoirs]. Moscow, 1908. (in Russ.)
Zhivov V. M. Marginal'naya kul'tura v Rossii i rozhdenie intelligentsia
[Marginal culture in Russia and the birth of intellectuals]. In: Zhivov V. M.
Razyskaniya v oblasti istorii i predystorii russkoy kul'tury [Research in the field
of history and prehistory of Russian culture]. Moscow, 2002, p. 685–704.
(in Russ.)
The Phenomenon of Cultural Expansion of Raznochintsy of 1860s:
The Literary Niche “Folk-Writers” С. 263–278. DOI 10.25205/2307-1737-2020-1-263-278