language. Earlier, a native speaker of Russian chose a noun case form
depending on the “requirements” of the grammatically dominant word.
Nowadays, more and more often, a native speaker chooses a noun case taking
into account the influence of several words included in its lexical and
grammatical environment. The article discusses in detail all the potential
elements of the lexical and grammatical environment of a noun that can
influence on the choice of its case form, and provides facts of their consolidated
or contradictory influence, which creates a choice problem. The lexical and
grammatical environment of a noun potentially includes a controlling word,
homogeneous terms of a sentence and generalizing word for them, a preposition
that can be combined with several case forms, an adjective, participle or number
dependent on the noun, as well as other nouns nearby. Each of the elements of
the environment influences the choice of case in its own way, so the speaker
often chooses a case form incorrectly. The phenomenon illustrates the antinomy
of language: 1) being singled out as part of a syntagm, a linguistic expression
seeks to expand its existence at the expense of other linguistic expressions;
2) being singled out as part of a syntagm, a linguistic expression is subjected to
pressure from neighboring linguistic expressions.
This article is devoted to a new phenomenon in modern Russian
language. Earlier, a native speaker of Russian chose a noun case form
depending on the “requirements” of the grammatically dominant word.
Nowadays, more and more often, a native speaker chooses a noun case taking
into account the influence of several words included in its lexical and
grammatical environment. The article discusses in detail all the potential
elements of the lexical and grammatical environment of a noun that can
influence on the choice of its case form, and provides facts of their consolidated
or contradictory influence, which creates a choice problem. The lexical and
grammatical environment of a noun potentially includes a controlling word,
homogeneous terms of a sentence and generalizing word for them, a preposition
that can be combined with several case forms, an adjective, participle or number
dependent on the noun, as well as other nouns nearby. Each of the elements of
the environment influences the choice of case in its own way, so the speaker
often chooses a case form incorrectly. The phenomenon illustrates the antinomy
of language: 1) being singled out as part of a syntagm, a linguistic expression
seeks to expand its existence at the expense of other linguistic expressions;
2) being singled out as part of a syntagm, a linguistic expression is subjected to
pressure from neighboring linguistic expressions.
Список литературы
Apresyan Yu. D. Idei i metody sovremennoy strukturnoy lingvistiki (kratkiy
ocherk). Moscow, 1966, 301 p. (in Russ.)
Apresyan Yu. D. Eksperimental’noe issledovanie semantiki russkogo glagola. Moscow, 1967, 251 p. (in Russ.)
Apresyan Yu. D. Leksicheskaya semantika. Sinonimicheskie sredstva yazyka. Moscow, 1974, 367 p. (in Russ.)
Batura T. V., Charintseva M. V. Osnovy obrabotki tekstovoy informatsii:
Ucheb. posobiye. Novosibirsk, 2016, 45 p. (in Russ.)
Beloshapkova V. A. Sintaksis. In: Sovremenny russkiy yazyk. 2 nd ed. Moscow, 1989, p. 532–792. (in Russ.)
Bondarko A. V. Teoriya morfologicheskikh kategoriy. Leningrad, Nauka
1976, 255 p. (in Russ.).
Cheremisina M. I. How the Predicate Valence Forms the Basic Simple Sentence. Zhurnal SFU. Gumanitarnye nauki, 2008, vol. 1, no. 2, p. 184–192.
Chesnokova L. D. Grammaticheskaya sochetayemost’ slov v prostom predlozhenii i faktory, obuslovlivayushchie ee. In: Sochetayemost’ yazykovykh
edinits. Rostov on Don, 1968, p. 5–22. (in Russ.)
Gak V. G. Yazykovye preobrazovaniya Moscow, 1998, 763 p. (in Russ.)
Glovinskaya M. Ya. Aktivnyye protsessy v grammatike (na materiale innovatsiy i massovykh yazykovykh oshibok). In: Russkiy yazyk kontsa XX
stoletiya (1985–1995). 2 nd ed. Moscow, 2000, p. 237–304. (in Russ.)
Katsnelson S. D. K ponyatiyu tipov valentnosti. Voprosy yazykoznaniya,
1987, no. 3, p. 20–32. (in Russ.)
Kim I. E. Lichnaya sfera cheloveka: struktura i yazykovoe voploshchenie.
Krasnoyarsk, 2009, 325 p. (in Russ.)
Kim I. E. Sotsial’nyye sub’’ekty: printsipy nominatsii. Vestnik of Novgorod
State Uni. Series: Philology. History, 2010, no. 57, p. 47–51. (in Russ.)
Kim I. E. Tri sposoba modelirovaniya sotsial’nykh realiy v sovremennom
russkom yazyke. Siberian Journal of Philology, 2011, p. 192–199. (in Russ.)
Kim I. E. Tendentsiya k razrusheniyu russkoy padezhnoy sistemy i predskazuemost’ sintaksicheskoy svyazi v teorii sintaksisa V. A. Beloshapkovoy. Vestnik of Tomsk Sate University. Series: Philology, 2018, no. 51, p. 9–24.
(in Russ.) DOI 10.17223/19986645/51/2
Kotelova N. Z. Znachenie slova i ego sochetaemost’ (k formalizatsii v yazykoznanii). Leningrad, 1975, 64 p. (in Russ.)
Kozlovskaya T. L. Obshchestvenno-gruppovaya otsenka upotrebleniya
umen’shitel’no-laskatel’nykh obrazovaniy v rechi nositeley sovremennogo russkogo yazyka. In: Kul’tura russkoy rechi i effektivnost’ obshcheniya. Moscow,
1996, p. 425–436. (in Russ.)
Levi-Bruhl L. Sverkh’’estestvennoye v pervobytnom myshlenii. Moscow,
1994, 608 p. (in Russ.)
Miloslavskiy I. G. Morfologiya. In: Sovremenny russkiy yazyk. 2 nd ed. Moscow, 1989, p. 532–792. (in Russ.)
Morkovkin V. V. Osnovy teorii uchebnoy leksikografii. Avtoref. dis. ... d-ra
filol. nauk. Moscow, 1990, 72 p. (in Russ.)
Novitskaya I. M. K sintaksisu svyaznogo teksta (na materiale nemetskogo
yazyka): Avtoref. dis. ... kand. filol. nauk. Leningrad, 1973, 22 p. (in Russ.)
Otkupshchikova M. I. Mestoimeniya sovremennogo russkogo yazyka
v strukturno-semanticheskom aspekte: Ucheb. Posobiye. Leningrad, 1984, 87 p.
(in Russ.)
Paducheva E. V. Denotativny status imennoy gruppy i ego otrazhenie v semanticheskom predstavlenii predlozheniya. Nauch.-tekhn. inform. Series 2,
1979, no. 9, p. 25–31. (in Russ.)
Paducheva E. V. Vozvratnoye mestoimeniye s kosvennym antetsedentom
i semantika refleksivnosti. In: Semiotika i informatika. Moscow, VINITI, 1983,
iss. 21, p. 3–33. (in Russ.)
Paducheva E. V. Vyskazyvanie i ego sootnesennost’ s deystvitel’nost’yu
(Referentsial’nye aspekty semantiki mestoimeniy). Moscow, Nauka, 1985,
271 p. (in Russ.)
Pike K. L. Grammemic Theory in Reference to Restricted Problems of Morpheme Classes. International Journal of American Linguistics, 1957, vol. 23,
no. 3 (jul.), p. 119–128. DOI 10.1086/464406
Ryabov V. N. Russkie intrayazykovye lakuny (formal’no-semanticheskiy
aspekt). Avtoref. dis. ... d-ra filol. nauk. Krasnodar, 1997, 42 p. (in Russ.)
Saussure F. de. Kurs obshchey lingvistiki. In: Saussure F. de. Trudy po
yazykoznaniyu. Moscow, Progress, 1977, p. 7–285. (in Russ.)
Shmelev D. N. Problemy semanticheskogo analiza leksiki. Moscow, 1973,
244 p. (in Russ.)
Stolyarova E. A. Sushchestvitel’nye. In: Razgovornaya rech’ v sisteme funktsional’nykh stiley sovremennogo russkogo yazyka: Leksika. Saratov, Saratov
State Uni. Press, 1983, p. 21–48. (in Russ.)
Tesniere L. Osnovy strukturnogo sintaksisa. Moscow, 1988, 656 p.
(in Russ.)
Testelets Ya. G. Refleksivizatsiya i tipologiya anafory. In: Tipologiya grammaticheskikh kategoriy: Tez. dokl. Vsesoyuz. nauch. konf. Leningrad, 1991,
p. 47–48. (in Russ.)
Valgina N. S. Sintaksis sovremennogo russkogo yazyka: Uchebnik. Moscow, 2000, 416 p. (in Russ.)
Vezhbitskaya A. Russkiy yazyk. In: Vezhbitskaya A. Yazyk. Kul’tura.
Poznaniye. Moscow, 1997, p. 33–88. (in Russ.)
Vorotnikov Yu. L. Stepeni kachestva v sovremennom russkom yazyke.
Moscow, 1999, 281 p. (in Russ.)
Yantsenetskaya M. N., Lebedeva N. B., Grushko N. E. et al. Semanticheskie
voprosy slovoobrazovaniya: Znacheniye proizvodyashchego slova. Tomsk,
1991, 272 p. (in Russ.)
Zaliznyak A. A. Russkoye imennoye slovoizmenenie. Moscow, Nauka,
1967, 370 p. (in Russ.)
Zemskaya E. A. Sovremenny russkiy yazyk. Slovoobrazovanie. Moscow,
1973, 304 p. (in Russ.)
Zolotova G. A. Sintaksicheskiy slovar’: Repertuar elementarnykh edinits
russkogo sintaksisa. Moscow, 1988, 440 p. (in Russ.)
Lexical and Grammatical Environment and Its Influence on the Noun
Case Form in Russian Language С. 129–151. DOI 10.25205/2307-1737-2020-2-129-151